On April 12, HBO made it official: We’re getting extra Harry Potter. Not new Harry Potter, per se — the Warner Bros. TV reboot will adapt the plot of the seven important books, retreading the content material of the primary eight films within the franchise. In response to the discharge, creator J.Okay. Rowling will function government producer on the “decade-long collection.”
Which raises the query: What would a Harry Potter present even appear to be in 2023? What might “Harry Potter, however once more” obtain that the originals didn’t? And do we predict the brand new Harry Potter TV present means there might be multiple magic faculty serving the whole thing of Asia?
In some methods, fixing these questions could appear inconsequential to the story of the Boy Who Lived and his battle in opposition to He Who Should Not Be Named. However for up to date audiences, it’s actually the one promise for the franchise left as Warner Bros. milks it throughout merchandise, video games, films, books, and now TV reveals: a wizarding world that really issues right this moment.
Hamburg’s The Wizard World Store
Photograph: Christian Charisius/image alliance through Getty Photos
Harry Potter has develop into a very thorny subject since creator J.Okay. Rowling has made quite a few statements in opposition to trans individuals. Her actions have coloured public notion of the Harry Potter books and its diversifications: What was as soon as seen as essential, beloved, and formative to (at the least) an entire technology of youngsters is now a kind of third rail. It’s more and more onerous to separate the creator and her political statements and actions, which have clouded the air across the franchise — calling into query what Harry Potter might, or ought to, be.
This specific adaptation has additionally made Rowling’s degree of involvement very clear. Within the launch for the Max Unique present, Rowling mentioned: “Max’s dedication to preserving the integrity of my books is vital to me, and I’m trying ahead to being a part of this new adaptation which is able to permit for a level of depth and element solely afforded by an extended type tv collection.”
It appears Rowling is intent on adapting the collection near its supply materials. However even that opens up some questions on what precisely the present will add element to. Over time, Rowling has shared further details about characters, retroactively making the collection seem inclusive. There’s the truth that Rowling said in a fan Q&A that Dumbledore is homosexual just some months after Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was printed, although she famously left this info out of the books. For some time it went largely unexplored within the Implausible Beasts films as properly.
However typically the fabric that’s within the books is much more questionable. Character names — like one of many solely important characters of East Asian descent being named “Cho Chang” — and the tokenization they characterize highlighted how myopically white Rowling’s fantastical Nice Britain (or at the least its wizards) had been. (Once more: This can be a world the place 4 entire continents have the identical wizarding faculty wants as a single nation in Europe.) Individuals have questioned the books’ portrayal of home elves or werewolves, and Jon Stewart lately made headlines for stating how the Gringotts goblins play into antisemitic caricatures.
Photograph: Warner Bros.
These are issues that may not even have caught out to readers — notably younger ones — on first blush. However now these particulars are more and more onerous to disregard, and in dire want of an replace.
A brand new Harry Potter present might definitely rectify a few of these issues. A present would have extra display time to drag in additional of the subplots adored within the books — extra Almost Headless Nick, or Fred and George exploits! Extra common Hogwarts shenanigans! A TV adaptation might additionally permit the story so as to add extra characters of colour within the principal solid, even recasting important roles with individuals of colour as Harry Potter and the Cursed Youngster did. Characters of colour who had been recognized extra for one-off strains might develop into key gamers, even when Harry Potter continues to be the white boy from the ebook jacket. The world of Harry Potter may very well be reimagined and held as much as extra scrutiny.
However actually, at this level, wanting extra from Harry Potter is sufficient to drive an individual loopy. Followers’ points with the franchise are baked in, whether or not on the foundational degree with the books or in more moderen releases like Hogwarts Legacy, which was embroiled in its personal share of controversies. Even an organization the size of Warner Bros. appears poised to observe alongside (although so lots of the reveals and films given the greenlight on the announcement of HBO Max’s rebrand had been based mostly on current IPs).
Most tellingly, amid the announcement of the brand new Harry Potter present, chairman and CEO of HBO and Max content material Casey Bloys opted to keep away from answering whether or not Rowling’s views, that are extensively critiqued as transphobic, would have an effect on the collection. “I don’t assume that is the discussion board,” Bloys mentioned. “That’s a really on-line dialog, very nuanced and sophisticated and never one thing we’re going to get into.” He added that the precedence is “what’s on the display,” which is an “extremely affirmative and optimistic” story about “love and acceptance.”
Photograph: Chris Delmas/AFP through Getty Photos
However characterizing discussions of transphobia and racism in Harry Potter as a “very on-line dialog” dismisses these subjects as unserious. Rowling’s politics have led some followers to cease spending cash on new releases associated to the franchise, with a view to keep away from supporting her in any manner. There are new children in new generations discovering Harry Potter, by films or books, on daily basis, and the concepts which are emphasised in these new releases and diversifications matter.
These concepts complicate a collection followers maintain expensive, and so they need to be addressed if the collection has any hope of being related. A fantastical world by which gender is inflexible and entire cultures need to envision themselves wedged right into a single wizarding faculty looks as if nothing fantastical in any respect. It might be unimaginable to totally untangle Rowling from the collection she created. However along with her so concerned in reinterpreting her story for TV in a brand new period, it’s onerous to think about Hogwarts trying like something apart from a really particular sort of want achievement.